Network on non-target effects of biocontrols

- L. VAN OUDENHOVE -

Non-target effects as a frame of reference to find and assess sustainable strategies for pest and vector management.

ENI-BC+
ENI-BC+ Consortium at the 2023 workshop

Academy 3 highlight

The ENI-BC+ network brings together academic researchers from different disciplines to work toward a common goal: evaluate the anthropogenic impact of “agriculture and farming on the environment and on society in order to design sustainable pathways” with the aim of protecting crops, livestock breeding, humans, and the environment.

The project

Biocontrol, a word with a wide meaning that covers a multitude of solutions, products and services for crop protection, is promoted by governments, industries and many researchers as the main tool for reducing the use of infamous synthetic pesticides. These are slowly being banned from European agriculture due to their non-target effects on health and the environment. This trend is the outcome of decades of research in developing new concepts and practical solutions, that have now proven their effectiveness. However, the non-target effects of biocontrol solutions have not been studied in depth because it is assumed that because of their biological or environmental origin, they do not have the same negative effects as chemical pesticides. Do biocontrol solutions really have a low environmental persistence and ecotoxicity? Do all the very diverse solutions present similar levels of risks? Could these risks be anticipated and/or avoided? When non-target effects are difficult to anticipate, how should monitoring be implemented after deployment to maximize both safety (for the environment, users and consumers) and the agroecological transition?
In 2020, we initiated a collective investigation of the non-target effects of these biocontrol solutions. A first virtual meeting gathered more than 50 researchers who expressed an interest in the topic. Two main ideas emerged. First, all the biocontrol solutions that deal with the same agricultural issues should be evaluated using the same criteria to provide comparable results. Second, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory as non-target effects are inherently diverse – ranging from effects on biodiversity to the functioning of human organizations – and their desirability depends on the social group considered. On this basis, it was decided to create the ENI-BC+ research network. Academy 3 helped the community to become more strongly structured and enabled collective research to take shape.
The network aims to promote the study of the non-target effects of crop protection strategies. The ultimate goal is to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, when synthetic pesticides were deployed, and to provide guidelines for choosing the best biocontrol solutions depending on the context and the region. In concrete terms, the network aims to stimulate the study of the non-target effects of pest and vector management strategies by firstly, federating an interdisciplinary scientific community, secondly, initiating new academic research projects, and thirdly, working collectively on interdisciplinary syntheses and conceptual frameworks. The network covers all the strategies (products, techniques and services) designed to protect crops and livestock breeding and to manage vector-borne diseases. It goes beyond the basic definition of biocontrol and proposes an integrative conception of pest and vector management encompassing plant, animal, human and environmental health. This aspiration is reflected in the acronym of the network: ENI, “Effets Non-Intentionnels”, French for non-target effects, and “BC+”, to designate BioControl strategies and more!
The ENI-BC+ network now includes more than 140 researchers from a wide range of disciplines in the natural and human sciences. These researchers work for different research institutes, universities, technical institutes, and French agencies (ANSES and the Ministry of agriculture and food safety). The network is organized around annual workshops attended by some forty scientists, during which lectures and presentations alternate with group discussions facilitated by collective intelligence tools. These workshops have given rise to research projects on specific issues, as well as two working groups on (1) the identification and categorization of target and non-target effects of pest control levers in agroecosystems, and (2) post-approval monitoring of alternative pest control methods. The ENI-BC+ network is, by its very nature, a collective project that involves many people. Only the most active (in the organization team or working groups) are listed below, but the strength of the network rests on all its participants!


ENI-BC+
ENI-BC+ Different regulations apply to corn production and sheep farming: can the study of non-target effects help to define sustainable strategies?






ENI-BC+
ENI-BC+ Pest management levers: a unifying typology

The +

This project has helped to structure and increase the visibility of the ENI-BC+ interdisciplinary research community. It has also led to the production of two collective syntheses on the typology of pest management levers and the characterization of the levels of integration that these levers might affect.

What’s next?

The aim of the ENI-BC+ network is to remain active and keep growing. This interdisciplinary community will be consolidated by the annual workshops which provide the opportunity for academics from different disciplines to focus on common objects and questions. Collective research will be pursued and will probably serve as a basis for upcoming projects. The ENI-BC+ network also aims to expand internationally, with the organization of an international event in 2025.


 

Project information

Scientific domain
Environmental and Human Health, Ecotoxicology, Social Sciences
Key words
Sustainability
Agriculture
Pest-management
Biocontrol
One Health
Total budget
€30,000 from Academy 3

Start of the project
2022


Partners
ISA - Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, INRAE
GREDEG - Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS
CBGP – INRAE, Cirad, IRD, Institut Agro Montpellier
ANSES
CEFE - Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD
EBI - Université de Poitiers, CNRS
SADAPT - INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay
ECOSYS - INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay
PSH - INRAE
BABEL - Université de Toulon
CIRAD
AgroParisTech
AGROSCOPE
Project members
Simon Fellous (CBGP)
Marcel Amichot (ISA)
Nicolas Borowiec (ISA)
Armel Gallet (ISA)
Anne-Violette Lavoir (ISA)
Nicolas Ris (ISA)
Elodie Vercken (ISA)
Manuel Boutet (Gredeg)
Aura Parmentier-Cajaiba (Gredeg)
Christophe Plantamp (Anses)
Lise Roy (Cefe)
Freddie-Jeanne Richard (EBI)
Armelle Mazé (Sadapt)
Laure Mamy (Ecosys)
Lucile Delatouche (Cirad)
Hélène Ledouble (Babel)
Julie Borg (PSH)
Bertrand Gauffre (PSH)
Myriam Siegwart (PSH)
Thierry Spataro (AgroParisTech)
Jana Collatz (Agroscope)
 
Students involved
D. Bonzi

Louise Van Oudenhove

ISA - Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, INRAE

 

Scientific promotion of the project

Workshop Website: